<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Google Chrome - Download Chrome &#38; Chrome Themes &#187; Google Chrome Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chromeaday.com/category/google-chrome-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chromeaday.com</link>
	<description>browser with technology to make the web faster, safer and easier.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Chrome Browser Not Yet Secure</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeaday.com/googles-chrome-browser-not-yet-secure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chromeaday.com/googles-chrome-browser-not-yet-secure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeaday.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we see theoritically, Chrome should be more secure than other browsers because, rather than being a single-threaded application, each tab is handled by its own sandboxed process. Google (NSDQ: GOOG)&#8217;s Chrome browser is only a day old, but security researchers already have found vulnerabilities that can be exploited. According to a report published by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we see theoritically, Chrome should be more secure than other browsers because, rather than being a single-threaded application, each tab is handled by its own sandboxed process.</p>
<p>Google (NSDQ: GOOG)&#8217;s Chrome browser is only a day old, but security researchers already have found vulnerabilities that can be exploited.<br />
According to a report published by ZDNet, security researcher Aviv Raff has found that he can combine a flaw in the open source WebKit engine with a Java bug to dupe Chrome users into downloading executable files.</p>
<p><span id="more-63"></span></p>
<p>Another security researcher, Rishi Narang, claimed to have found a way to crash Chrome with a malicious link.<br />
&#8220;An issue exists in how chrome behaves with undefined-handlers in chrome.dll version 0.2.149.27,&#8221; Narang explained on the Evil Fingers Web site. &#8220;A crash can result without user interaction. When a user is made to visit a malicious link, which has an undefined handler followed by a &#8216;special&#8217; character, the Chrome crashes with a Google Chrome message window &#8216;Whoa! Google Chrome has crashed. Restart now?&#8217; &#8221;<br />
And someone identified as &#8220;Nerex&#8221; has posted proof-of-concept JavaScript code on Milw0rm.com that supposedly &#8220;allows files (e.g., executables) to be automatically downloaded to the user&#8217;s computer without any user prompt.&#8221;<br />
This exploit appears to be similar to the one identified by Raff.<br />
In theory, Google Chrome should be more secure than other browsers because, rather than being a single-threaded application, each tab is handled by its own sandboxed process with its own memory space. Like a multiengine plane, Chrome is designed not to crash following the loss of a single engine.<br />
&#8220;[Chrome] utilizes technology that has historically been associated with operating systems to create isolation between different browser tabs with the aim of improved crash-resistance and security,&#8221; IDC analyst Al Hilwa said in a research note. &#8220;The security capabilities also ensue from a new sandbox model that strengthens what is typically available today from other browsers.&#8221;<br />
But Chrome is beta software and remains a work in progress.</p>
<p>Hilwa observes that while Google&#8217;s security architecture isolates the browser&#8217;s kernel from attacks on rendering-engine vulnerabilities, it doesn&#8217;t extend this same protection to plug-ins like Java, Flash, and Silverlight.<br />
Mozilla software engineer Robert O&#8217;Callahan in a blog post said that while Chrome looks promising, Google&#8217;s coders still have challenges to overcome. &#8220;There are some interesting architectural problems they haven&#8217;t solved yet, especially with the process separation model, especially with regard to windowless plugins, and also Mac,&#8221; he said. &#8220;These are problems that will be encountered by anyone doing process separation so it will be interesting to see how that goes.&#8221;<br />
Take a spin through our Google Chrome image gallery and have a look at the browser that&#8217;s being touted as a game-changer.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://googlebrowser-chrome.blogspot.com/2008/09/googles-chrome-browser-not-yet-secure.html">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chromeaday.com/googles-chrome-browser-not-yet-secure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome &lt; 0.3.154.9 Address Spoofing</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeaday.com/google-chrome-031549-address-spoofing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chromeaday.com/google-chrome-031549-address-spoofing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeaday.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Description: Synopsis : The remote host contains a web browser that is affected by an address spoofing vulnerability. Description : The version of Google Chrome installed on the remote host is earlier than 0.3.154.9. Such versions are reportedly are affected by an address spoofing vulnerability in pop-ups. An attacker can leverage this issue to manipulate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<tr>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Description:</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
Synopsis :</p>
<p>The remote host contains a web browser that is affected by an address<br />
spoofing vulnerability.</p>
<p>Description :</p>
<p>The version of Google Chrome installed on the remote host is earlier<br />
than 0.3.154.9.  Such versions are reportedly are affected by an<br />
address spoofing vulnerability in pop-ups.  An attacker can leverage<br />
this issue to manipulate a window&#8217;s address bar to show a different<br />
address than the actual origin of the content.</p>
<p>See also :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498232/30/0/threaded" target="_blank">http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498232/30/0/threaded</a><br />
<a href="http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2008/10/beta-release-031549.html" target="_blank">http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2008/10/beta-release-031549.html</a></p>
<p>Solution :</p>
<p>Upgrade to Google Chrome version 0.3.154.9 or later. </td>
</tr>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chromeaday.com/google-chrome-031549-address-spoofing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
